Thinking Writing
Skip to content Skip to section menu Skip to text site-level menu
.
 This Section:  Effective Assessment Strategies

Section Menu:

Bullet point Introduction
Bullet point Feedback for Action
Bullet point A Hierarchy of Concerns
Bullet point 3 Peer Review Activities

Case Studies

Case Study 1
This page part 1
Bullet point part 2

Case Study 2
This page part 1
This page part 2
This page part 3
This page part 4
This page part 5

Bullet point Why Redraft?

 


 

This case study records a series of activities tried out by a tutor in Biological Sciences with the aim of improving his students’ essay writing.

Second year students were asked to write an essay in response to the question:

‘Is my final year project addressing an interesting biological question?’

The tutor provided written and oral feedback, and asked the students to go away and revise the essay. When the students brought these to class, the tutor handed them a sheet of questions to help them reflect on the second essay and asked them to write comments in response to them. These were handed in with the second essay. This essay was read not just by the tutor but by a fellow student who was given a detailed set of questions on which to base comments and feedback. Students received a grade not just for their revised essay but for the quality of their comments as peer reviewers. Students did not have a chance to further revise their essays in the light of peer review.

The next page invites you to ask yourself some questions about the case study, and enables you to print off the materials that were used.

Bullet point Next page in this section >>>


Back to homepage